A Letter to UVa’s Board of Visitors Concerning the Continued Presence of Rector Dragas
I just received an e-mail purportedly co-authored by UVa President Teresa Sullivan and Rector Helen Dragas. The e-mail promises cooperation and hand-holding and lots of hugs and kisses and warm fuzzy stuff. In other words, it’s total P.R. trash designed to reassure the dulled wits of the extra gullible.
If you haven’t been following the story, Dragas is the head of UVa’s Board of Visitors. In early June 2012 she led a quiet coup to have Sullivan removed as President of the University, dropping the news a week after the student body had left town for the summer. On a Sunday. The whole thing stank of dirty pool.
To be honest, I don’t know a terrible lot about President Sullivan other than that she’s an accomplished administrator and people who work with her seem to like her. When she speaks, she’s a bit too diplomatic for my taste, but I guess that’s part of the job description. What I do know is that the ouster was incredibly shady for an institution that prides itself on transparency. The whole thing smacked of rich people meddling in stuff to make extra bucks for their contractor buddies. (“If we sweep it under the rug on a Sunday, the stupid proletariat will have forgotten it by Monday’s bologna lunch or whatever these filth consider nourishment…“)
Whatever. The email bugged me. And since I haven’t written anything in a while, I thought I’d drop the Board a line to express my concern about Dragas’ continued presence. (A copy was also cc’d to the President’s office.) The text is as follows:
From: Stephen D. Barling III, UVa class of ’93
To: Susan G. Harris, Secretary to the Board of Visitors Office
As an alumnus of the University and one who has followed recent events closely, I am confused by Helen Dragas’ continued presence as Rector of UVa’s Board of Visitors. Regardless of Ms. Dragas’ proclaimed professional accomplishments in other arenas, it seems clear that she is at the very least conspiratorial, dishonest, short-sighted and bold to the point of recklessness.
After her failed coup attempt at the University, we can surmise that Ms. Dragas is not someone who can be relied upon in any professional capacity, that she does not nor has she ever had the University’s best interests at heart, and that she is, in short, a venomous operative who sheepishly returned to the negotiating table only after having her proverbial buttock handed to her by the University community, the faculty, and ultimately, the Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia himself.
What sort of hubris does a person require to make such a massive public error of judgement and then turn around and try to pretend that all is right in the world?
I am certain that I am not alone in assuring you that no faith shall ever be placed in Ms. Dragas as relates to directing the future of the University. I hope that the Board and other governing bodies will reflect deeply on this matter and consider an early retirement for Ms. Dragas.
UVa alum and Charlottesville resident